Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Haas

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Haas, 88 Ohio St.3d 1228, 2000-Ohio-319.] CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. HAAS. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Haas (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 1228.] (No. 98-378 Submitted and decided January 12, 2000.) ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent Loren Sue Haas, Attorney Registration No. 0001848, last known address in West Chester, Ohio. The court coming now to consider its order of November 25, 1998, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of two years with one year stayed, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore, IT IS ORDERED by this court that the last year of respondent s two-year suspension be stayed and, further, that respondent, Loren Sue Haas, be and hereby is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. 1 For earlier case, see Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Haas (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 85, 702 N.E.2d 59. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.