State ex rel. Stanfar v. Indus. Comm

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as State ex rel. Stanfar v. Indus. Comm., 90 Ohio St.3d 68, 2000-Ohio-16.] THE STATE EX REL. STANFAR, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE, ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Stanfar v. Indus. Comm. (2000), 90 Ohio St.3d 68.] Workers compensation Court of appeals judgment affirmed. (No. 00-15 Submitted July 25, 2000 Decided September 20, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 98AP-1397. __________________ Tablack, Wellman, Jeren, Hackett & Skoufatos Co., L.P.A., John A. Jeren, Jr., and Edward J. Hartwig, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Mary Ann O. Rini, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and order the Industrial Commission to comply with State ex rel. Noll v. Indus. Comm. (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 203, 567 N.E.2d 245. DOUGLAS and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.