Williams v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
WILLIAMS ET AL., APPELLANTS, V. GRANGE MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, APPELLEE, ET AL. [Cite as Williams v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co. (1996), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 94-1501 -- Submitted November 7, 1995 -- Decided January 31, 1996.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 93APE12- 1735. ______________ Scott E. Smith Co., L.P.A., and Scott E. Smith, for appellants. Lane, Alton & Horst, Rick E. Marsh and William Scott Lavelle for appellee. ______________ The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. MOYER, C.J., WRIGHT and COOK, JJ., dissent. COOK, J., dissenting. I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., and WRIGHT, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
