State ex rel. Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co. v. Indus. Comm.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of Ohio are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27, 1992, pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer. Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio. Attention: Walter S. Kobalka, Reporter, or Justine Michael, Administrative Assistant. Tel.: (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010. Your comments on this pilot project are also welcome. NOTE: Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the full texts of the opinions after they have been released electronically to the public. The reader is therefore advised to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions. The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound volumes of the Ohio Official Reports. The State ex rel. Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Company, Appellee, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellants. [Cite as State ex rel. Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co. v. Indus. Comm. (1992), Ohio St.3d .] Workers' compensation -- Handicap reimbursements -- Decision of court of appeals vacated and cause remanded to that court for further proceedings. (No. 91-777 -- Submitted July 8, 1992 -- Decided July 29, 1992.) Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 90AP-1249. Hanlon, Duff & Paleudis Co., L.P.A., and Gerald P. Duff, for appellee. Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, and Gerald H. Waterman, for appellants. The decision of the court of appeals is vacated and the cause is remanded to that court for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in Columbus & Southern Ohio Elec. Co. v. Indus. Comm. (1992), Ohio St.3d , N.E.2d . Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
