Cleveland City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Don M. Hisaka & Assoc., Inc.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of Ohio are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27, 1992, pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer. Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio. Attention: Walter S. Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Whitten, Administrative Assistant. Tel.: (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010. Your comments on this pilot project are also welcome. NOTE: Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the full texts of the opinions after they have been released electronically to the public. The reader is therefore advised to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions. The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound volumes of the Ohio Official Reports. Board of Education of the Cleveland City School District, Cuyahoga County, Ohio, Appellee, v. Don M. Hisaka & Associaties, Inc.; United Pacific Insurance Company, Appellant. [Cite as Cleveland City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Don M. Hisaka & Assoc., Inc. (1992), Ohio St.3d .] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 91-1776 -- Submitted October 21, 1992 -- Decided December 30, 1992.) Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 60374. Cavitch, Familo & Durkin Co., L.P.A., Douglas A. DiPalma and E. John Brzytwa, for appellee. Weston, Hurd, Fallon, Paisley & Howley, David Arnold, Jerome W. Cook and William H. Baughman, Jr., for appellant. This cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. The court orders that the court of appeals' opinion not be published in the Ohio Official Reports, and that it may not be cited as authority except by the parties inter se. Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
