In re Baby Girl Doe
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as In re Baby Girl Doe, 2002-Ohio-2052.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF LUCAS COUNTY In the Matter of Baby Girl Doe, a/k/a Baby Girl N., d/o/b 10/10/01 Court of Appeals No. L-02-1027 Trial Court No. JC-01-095788 DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY Decided: April 22, 2002 * * * * * Renisa A. Dorner and Christy L. Cole, for appellant Kevin W. Sarah A. McHugh, for appellants Edwin N., Mary Ann N. and Natalie N. * * * * * HANDWORK, J. {¶1} This matter is before the court on "APPELLANTS' PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION" which this court sua sponte dismisses. Appellants sought to prohibit a probate judge from taking certain action. {¶2} However, appellants have failed to follow the correct procedure to institute an original action as set forth in 6th Dist.Loc.App.R. 6. Additionally, appellants' petition for writ of prohibition moves us to prevent a judge from taking certain action; however, no probate judge was named in this action and none was served. {¶3} with 6th Accordingly, insofar as appellants have failed to comply Dist.Loc.App.R. appellants' petition for 6, this writ of court sua prohibition sponte and dismisses orders petition stricken from the appellate record of L-02-1027. the Costs assessed to appellants. WRIT DISMISSED. Peter M. Handwork, J. ____________________________ JUDGE James R. Sherck, J. Richard W. Knepper, J. CONCUR. ____________________________ JUDGE ____________________________ JUDGE 2.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
