State v. Boyd
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as State v. Boyd, 2023-Ohio-2369.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT BELMONT COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DONALD THOMAS BOYD, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY Case No. 21 BE 0048 Appellant’s Limited Motion for Reconsideration BEFORE: Cheryl L. Waite, Carol Ann Robb, Mark A. Hanni, Judges. JUDGMENT: Moot. Atty. J. Kevin Flanagan, Belmont County Prosecutor and Atty. Jacob A. Manning, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, 52160 National Road, St. Clairsville, Ohio 43950, for Plaintiff-Appellee Atty. Brian A. Smith, Brian A. Smith Law Firm, LLC, 123 South Miller Road, Suite 250, Fairlawn, Ohio 44333, for Defendant-Appellant. Dated: June 30, 2023 –2– PER CURIAM {¶1} Appellant Donald Thomas Boyd filed a limited motion for reconsideration of our Opinion in State v. Boyd, 7th Dist. Belmont No. 21 BE 0048, 2023-Ohio-1120. Appellant challenges the remedy for the trial court’s failure to properly impose a sentence consistent with the Reagan Tokes Act. However, the trial court has already corrected the error by ordering a limited resentencing hearing. Thus, this matter is moot. JUDGE CHERYL L. WAITE JUDGE CAROL ANN ROBB JUDGE MARK A. HANNI NOTICE TO COUNSEL This document constitutes a final judgment entry. Case No. 21 BE 0048 [Cite as State v. Boyd, 2023-Ohio-2369.]
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
