State v. Collins
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as State v. Collins, 2020-Ohio-1594.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COLUMBIANA COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KHALIS COLLINS, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY Case No. 18 CO 0012 Application to Reopen BEFORE: Gene Donofrio, Carol Ann Robb, David A. D’Apolito, Judges. JUDGMENT: Denied Atty. Robert Herron, Prosecutor, Atty. Alec Beech, Assistant Prosecutor, Columbiana County Prosecutor’s Office, Columbiana County Courthouse, 105 South Market Street, Lisbon, Ohio 44432 for Plaintiff-Appellee and Atty. Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, Atty. Jeremy Masters, Assistant Public Defender, Office of the Ohio Public Defender, The Midland Building, 250 East Broad Street, Suite 1400, Columbus, Ohio 43215, for Defendant-Appellant. –2– April 15, 2020 PER CURIAM. {¶1} Defendant-appellant, Khalis Collins, has filed an application for reopening of his direct appeal from his convictions for tampering with evidence, obstructing official business, possession of drugs, and complicity to illegal conveyance of drugs onto the grounds of a detention facility. State v. Collins, 7th Dist. Columbiana No. 18 CO 0012, 2019-Ohio-2407, appeal not allowed, 157 Ohio St.3d 1429, 2019-Ohio-4003, 131 N.E.3d 971. For the following reason, the application is denied. {¶2} An application to reopen an appeal must be filed “within ninety days from journalization of the appellate judgment unless the applicant shows good cause for filing at a later time.” App.R. 26(B). {¶3} Our judgment in this case was filed on June 14, 2019. Appellant filed this application on February 3, 2020, over four-and-a-half months past the deadline. Thus, the application is untimely. {¶4} If the application is filed more than ninety days after journalization of the appellate judgment, then it must contain “[a] showing of good cause for untimely filing in the application.” App.R. 26(B)(2)(b). {¶5} Appellant has not asserted any cause for his late filing, let alone “good cause” as is required by the Appellate Rule. {¶6} For the above reasons, appellant’s application to reopen his appeal is hereby denied. Case No. 18 CO 0012 –3– JUDGE GENE DONOFRIO JUDGE CAROL ANN ROBB JUDGE DAVID A. D’APOLITO NOTICE TO COUNSEL This document constitutes a final judgment entry. Case No. 18 CO 0012
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
