Percio v. Smith

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Percio v. Smith, 2016-Ohio-3482.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CLARK COUNTY VALERIE PERCIO, et al. Plaintiffs-Appellants v. DAVID C. SMITH, et al. Defendant-Appellee : : : : : : : : : : C.A. CASE NO. 2015-CA-81 T.C. NO. 12-CV-491 (Civil Appeal from Common Pleas Court) ........... OPINION Rendered on the ___17th___ day of ____June____, 2016. ........... BRYAN O. STEWARD, Atty. Reg. No. 0082014 and WILLIAM W. JOHNSTON, Atty. Reg. No. 0021772, 800 Cross Pointe Rd., Suite E, Gahanna, Ohio 43215 Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellants DAVID C. SMITH, 12811 E. National Road, South Vienna, Ohio 45369 Defendant-Appellee DENNIS HANEY, 12811 E. National Road, South Vienna, Ohio 45369 Defendant-Appellee ............. FROELICH, J. {¶ 1} Valerie Percio appeals from a judgment of the Clark County Court of Common Pleas, which entered judgment in favor of Percio and Joan Grieco and against -2- Dennis Haney in the amount of $66,500.1 The trial court’s judgment did not address the claims against David Smith, another defendant. {¶ 2} In a prior appeal, this court reversed the trial court’s June 5, 2013 judgment in favor of both Haney and Smith, and remanded for further proceedings. As a result of that reversal, the June 5, 2013 judgment in favor of Smith was no longer effective. Upon remand, the trial court was required to address the claims against both Smith and Haney in order to have a final appealable order. {¶ 3} Because the trial court’s judgment failed to dispose of the claims against Smith, and in the absence of a proper Civ.R. 54(B) certification, this appeal must be dismissed for want of a final appealable order. ............. DONOVAN, P.J. and WELBAUM, J., concur. Copies mailed to: Bryan O. Steward William W. Johnston David C. Smith Dennis Haney Hon. Douglas M. Rastatter A merit brief was filed by Percio and Joan Grieco. However, only Percio filed a notice of appeal. 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.