STate v. McHale
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as STate v. McHale, 2006-Ohio-4159.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 21198 v. : T.C. NO. 2000 CR 02311 MICHAEL T. MCHALE : (Criminal Appeal from Common Pleas Court) Defendant-Appellant : : .......... OPINION Rendered on the 11th day of August , 2006. .......... JENNIFER B. FREDERICK, Atty. Reg. No. 0076440, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, 301 W. Third Street, 5th Floor, Dayton, Ohio 45422 Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellee MICHAEL T. MCHALE, #413-888, Warren Correctional Institution, 5787 State Route 63, P. O. Box 120, Lebanon, Ohio 45036 Defendant-Appellant .......... GLASSER, J. (by assignment) {¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant Michael McHale appeals his non-minimum sentence for his convictions on two counts of rape of a child under the age of thirteen and four counts of 2 pandering sexually oriented matter involving a minor. In 2001 McHale was sentenced to twenty years in prison. We affirmed McHale s convictions and sentence on appeal. State v. McHale, Montgomery App. No. 18963, 2002-Ohio-2373. A summary of the facts and procedural history of the case may be found therein. {¶ 2} McHale s assignment of error: {¶ 3} The trial court erred when imposing non-minimum sentence s (sic) on a person whom has not previously served a prison term, in violation of the Sixth Amendment, according to Apprendi v. New Jersey, and re-affirmed in Blakely v. Washington, and United States v. Booker & Fan Fan. {¶ 4} McHale insists that the United States Supreme Court s holding in Blakely v. Washington (2004), 542 U.S. 961, 124 S.Ct. 2531 required the trial court to order only a minimum sentence because he was a first-time offender who had never before served a prison term. However, the court also has limited Blakely s holding to cases already on direct appeal or pending before a trial court. United States v. Booker (2005), 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738. Because the holding is not retroactive, it cannot be applied in this case. {¶ 5} Furthermore, McHale did not object in the trial court to the imposition of the twenty-year sentence for his crimes. To the contrary, the sentence was agreed upon as part of a plea agreement whereby numerous additional charges were dropped and the force element of the rape charges were dismissed. Failure to raise this issue in the trial court before sentencing waives the issue for appellate review. State v. Cressel, Montgomery App. Nos. 20337 & 20348, 2005-Ohio-2013, citation omitted. {¶ 6} Accordingly, McHale s sole assignment of error is overruled, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. 3 .......... WOLFF, J. and FAIN, J., concur. (Hon. George M. Glasser retired from the Sixth District Court of Appeals sitting by assignment of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Ohio). Copies mailed to: Jennifer B. Frederick Michael T. McHale Hon. Gregory F. Singer
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
