State v. Fletcher
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as State v. Fletcher, 2006-Ohio-3194.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 21172 v. : T.C. QUINN L. FLETCHER : Defendant-Appellant NO. 2003-CR-2373 (Criminal Appeal from Common Pleas Court) : : .......... OPINION Rendered on the 23rd day of June , 2006. .......... JENNIFER B. FREDERICK, Atty. Reg. No. 0076440, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, 301 W. Third Street, 5th Floor, Dayton, Ohio 45422 Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellee QUINN L. FLETCHER, #458-270, Chillicothe Correctional Inst., P.O. Box 5500, Chillicothe, Ohio 45601 Defendant-Appellant, Pro Se .......... DONOVAN, J. {¶ 1} This matter is before the court on the pro se Notice of Appeal of Quinn L. Fletcher, filed July 20, 2005. Fletcher was convicted of the offenses of illegal use of a minor in nudity-oriented material or performance (count one), and sexual battery (count two), and the court designated him as a sexually oriented offender. On November 4, 2003, the court sentenced him to a term of five years on count one and four years on count two to be served 2 concurrently. Fletcher did not file a notice of appeal. On June 17, 2005, Fletcher filed a Motion for Resentencing pursuant to Blakely v. Washington (2004) 147 U.S. 2531, 124 S.Ct. 2531, and U.S. v. Booker (2005), 125 U.S. 538, 125 S.Ct. 2531. On June 21, the trial court overruled Fletcher s Motion, holding that Fletcher waived any objection he may have had under Blakely and Booker by failing to object at the time of sentencing. Fletcher s appeal is from the trial court s order. {¶ 2} Because the court s November 4, 2003 judgment of sentence was a final order that was not appealed, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to resentence Fletcher on the motion he filed on June 17, 2005. The trial court did not err when it overruled Fletcher s motion. Judgment affirmed. .......... GRADY, P.J. and BROGAN, J., concur. Copies mailed to: Jennifer B. Frederick Quinn L. Fletcher Hon. G. Jack Davis
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
