State v. Adams
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as State v. Adams, 2006-Ohio-2104.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR CHAMPAIGN COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff- Appellee : C.A. Case No. 2005-CA-12 vs. : T.C. Case No. 99-CR-216 JEREMY ADAMS : : (Criminal Appeal from Common Pleas Court) Defendant-Appellant : ........... OPINION Rendered on the 28th day of April , 2006. ........... NICK SELVAGGIO, Prosecutor, 200 N. Main Street, Courthouse, Urbana, Ohio 43078 Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellee SCOTT M. CALAWAY, Atty. Reg. #0068350, 24 Hadley Avenue, Dayton, Ohio 45419 Attorney for Defendant-Appellant JEREMY ADAMS, 7270 E. St. Rt. 36, Cable, Ohio 43009 Defendant-Appellant, Pro Se ............. BROGAN, J. {¶ 1} On July 10, 2000, Jeremy Adams was convicted in Champaign County Common Pleas Court of one count of grand theft and one count of engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity. Adams was placed on community control for three years. On June 6, 2002, the trial court revoked Adam s community control sanction and imposed a sentence of 17 months on the grand theft conviction and three years on the 2 corrupt activity conviction to be served concurrently. On April 3, 2003, this court reversed the trial court s revocation and ordered Adams to be resentenced. {¶ 2} On April 22, 2003, the trial court again placed Adams on community control and informed Adams he would be resentenced to three years in prison in the event he violated the terms of community control. {¶ 3} On January 21, 2005, the trial court found that Adams violated the terms of his community control by testing positive for cocaine use. Adams did not contest the violation. The trial court again placed Adams on community control conditioned on his completion of long term residential drug treatment at Nova House. {¶ 4} Adams appealed and his appointed counsel filed an Anders brief asserting he could find no appealable issue. Adams was notified of his right to file his own brief and he declined to do so. We have carefully reviewed the record and agree no arguable issue exists for overturning the trial court s judgment. The Judgment of the trial court is Affirmed. ........... WOLFF, J., and FAIN, J., concur. Copies mailed to: Nick Selvaggio Scott M. Calaway Jeremy Adams Hon. Roger B. Wilson
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
