State v. Moore
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as State v. Moore, 2002-Ohio-2374.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 18909 v. : T.C. CASE NO. 99 CR 1841 STELLA Y. MOORE : Defendant-Appellant : .......... OPINION Rendered on the 17th day of May , 2002. .......... CARLEY J. INGRAM, Atty. Reg. No. 0020084, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, 301 W. Third Street, 5th Floor, Dayton, Ohio 45422 Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellee C. DOUGLAS COPLEY, Atty. Reg. No. 0066825, 854 E. Franklin Street, Centerville, Ohio 45459 Attorney for Defendant-Appellant STELLA Y. MOORE, 2602 Riverview Road, Dayton, Ohio 45407 Defendant-Appellant .......... FREDERICK N. YOUNG, J. {¶1} After an extensive trial, a jury found Stella Y. Moore guilty of the offense of arson. She was ultimately sentenced to five years of community control. Moore filed a 2 notice of appeal, and in due course, her appointed appellate counsel filed an Anders brief, alleging that after thoroughly examining the record and the law, he concluded that there were no meritorious issues for appeal. {¶2} On February 12, 2002, we informed Moore of the fact that her counsel had filed an Anders brief and granted her sixty days from that date to file her pro se brief, if any. {¶3} No such pro se brief has been filed. {¶4} We have thoroughly examined the record of the proceedings in this case, and we agree with the assessment of appellate counsel that there are no meritorious issues for appellate review. {¶5} The judgment appealed from is affirmed. .......... FAIN, J. and GRADY, J., concur. Copies mailed to: Carley J. Ingram C. Douglas Copley Stella Y. Moore Hon. A. J. Wagner
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
