State v. Davis
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as State v. Davis, 2001-Ohio-7022.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff-Appellee : : v. BEVERLY J. DAVIS C.A. CASE NO. 18621 T.C. CASE NO. 00 CR 1489 : Defendant-Appellant : .......... OPINION Rendered on the 21st day of December , 2001. .......... CARLEY J. INGRAM, Atty. Reg. No. 0020084, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, 301 W. Third Street, Suite 500, Dayton, Ohio 45422 Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellee DAVID J. FIERST, Atty. Reg. No. 0043954, Suite 205 Claypool Building, 4130 Linden Avenue, Dayton, Ohio 45432 BEVERLY J. DAVIS, #48965, Ohio Reformatory for Women, 1479 Collins Avenue, Marysville, Ohio 43040 Defendant-Appellant .......... FREDERICK N. YOUNG, J. After an extensive trial, a jury found Beverly J. Davis guilty of both aggravated 2 burglary and felonious assault. She was ultimately sentenced to concurrent terms of three and two years imprisonment. Davis filed a notice of appeal, and in due course, her appointed appellate counsel filed an Anders brief, alleging that after thoroughly examining the record and the law, he concluded that there were no meritorious issues for appeal. On August 20, 2001, we informed Davis of the fact that her counsel had filed an Anders brief and granted her sixty days from that date to file her pro se brief, if any. No such pro se brief has been filed. We have thoroughly examined the record of the proceedings in this case, and we agree with the assessment of appellate counsel that there are no meritorious issues for appellate review. The judgment appealed from is affirmed. .......... FAIN, J. and GRADY, J., concur. Copies mailed to: Carley J. Ingram David J. Fierst Beverly J. Davis Hon. Dennis J. Langer
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
