Walter v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Walter v. Allstate Ins. Co., 2004-Ohio-3080.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) MARY C. WALTER, et al. C.A. No. 21599 APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF SUMMIT, OHIO CASE No. CV 01-02-0658 Appellees v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY Appellee and CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, et al. Appellants DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY Dated: June 16, 2004 This cause was heard upon the record in the trial court. Each error assigned has been reviewed and the following disposition is made: CARR, Presiding Judge. {¶1} Appellants, Continental Casualty Company and Transportation Insurance Company, appeal the decision of the Summit County Court of Common 2 Pleas, which awarded judgment to appellee, Mary Walter. For the reasons that follow, this Court dismisses the appeal for lack of a final, appealable order. I. {¶2} Mary Walter alleged that she was injured on June 6, 2002, when a vehicle operated by Karla Graebner turned into her lane of travel and struck the vehicle she was driving. Appellee and her husband received $50,000 from Geico Insurance Company, Graebner s insurance carrier. Appellee and her husband Richard filed a declaratory action against Allstate Insurance Company ( Allstate ), CNA Commercial Insurance1, and Transportation Insurance Company ( Transportation ), seeking uninsured motorist coverage benefits for the accident. {¶3} Continental Casualty Company ( Continental ) filed a motion for summary judgment. The Walters and Allstate filed cross motions for summary judgment against Continental. The trial court granted the motions for summary judgment against Continental and denied Continental s motion for summary judgment. Continental and Transportation moved the trial court to reconsider its decision. The trial court denied the motion to reconsider. The matter proceeded to a jury trial. The jury returned a verdict in favor of appellee on her claim and in favor of Allstate, Continental, and Transportation on Mr. Walter s claim. In an 1 Continental Casualty Company was improperly called CNA Commercial Insurance in the amended complaint. Court of Appeals of Ohio, Ninth Judicial District 3 entry journalized on May 14, 2003, the trial court entered judgment in favor of appellee in the amount of $200,000. {¶4} On May 16, 2003, appellee filed a motion for prejudgment interest. Appellants filed a motion in opposition on May 28, 2003. The motion is still pending before the trial court. {¶5} Appellants filed a notice of appeal with this Court on June 13, 2003. For the reasons set forth below, this Court does not reach the merits of the appeal. II. {¶6} Before addressing the merits of the assigned errors, this Court first must determine whether we are presented with a final appealable order within the court s jurisdiction. {¶7} The Ohio Constitution limits an appellate court s jurisdiction to the review of final judgments of lower courts. Section 3(B) (2), Article IV. For a judgment to be final and appealable, the requirements of R.C. 2505.02 and Civ.R. 54(B), if applicable, must be satisfied. Chef Italiano Corp. v. Kent State Univ. (1989), 44 Ohio St.3d 86, 88. Pursuant to R.C. 2505.02, an order is both final and appealable if it resolves all claims against all parties or it resolves at least one full cause of action in a multiple claim case with an express certification that there is no just reason for delay pursuant to Civ.R. 54(B). Dellagnese v. First Fed S. & L. Assn. (Feb. 20, 1991), 9th Dist. No. 14809, citing Norvell v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Appeals of Ohio, Ninth Judicial District 4 Hosp. (1983), 11 Ohio App.3d 70, 71. See, also, Bench Signs Unlimited v. Stark Area Regional Transit Auth., 9th Dist. No. 21574, 2003-Ohio-6324, at ¶3. {¶8} Generally speaking, judgments that determine liability, but defer the issue of damages for later determination, are not final appealable orders *** because damages are part of a claim for relief[.] McKee v. Inabnitt, 4th Dist No. 01CA711, 2001-Ohio-2595. An unresolved motion for prejudgment interest is part of the entire claim for relief. Id. In the present case, appellee filed a motion for prejudgment interest on May 16, 2003. The case was appealed before the trial court ruled on the motion for prejudgment interest. Because the issue of prejudgment interest has not been determined, the judgment entry does not present a final appealable order. McKee, supra; Driscoll v. Norprop, Inc. (Apr. 3, 1997), 8th Dist. No. 70891; Timmotors, Inc. v. Lima Ford, Inc., 3rd Dist. No. 1-2000-11, 2001-Ohio-2138. In the absence of a final appealable order, this Court lacks jurisdiction to review the assigned errors. III. {¶9} Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Appeal dismissed. The Court finds that there were reasonable grounds for this appeal. We order that a special mandate issue out of this Court, directing the Court of Common Pleas, County of Summit, State of Ohio, to carry this judgment into Court of Appeals of Ohio, Ninth Judicial District 5 execution. A certified copy of this journal entry shall constitute the mandate, pursuant to App.R. 27. Immediately upon the filing hereof, this document shall constitute the journal entry of judgment, and it shall be file stamped by the Clerk of the Court of Appeals at which time the period for review shall begin to run. App.R. 22(E). The Clerk of the Court of Appeals is instructed to mail a notice of entry of this judgment to the parties and to make a notation of the mailing in the docket, pursuant to App.R. 30. Costs taxed to appellants. Exceptions. DONNA J. CARR FOR THE COURT SLABY, J. BATCHELDER, J. CONCUR APPEARANCES: THOMAS J. CABRAL, TIMOTHY J. FITZGERALD and RICHARD C.O. REZIE, Attorneys at Law, Seventh Floor, Bulkley Bldg., 1501 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44115, for appellant Continental Casualty Company. RICHARD E. DOBBINS and NICHOLAS SWYRYDENKO, Attorneys at Law, 1000 S. Cleveland-Massillon Road, Akron, OH 44333, for appellee, Mary C. Walter. Court of Appeals of Ohio, Ninth Judicial District 6 G. MICHAEL CURTIN AND WILLIAM J. PRICE, Attorneys at Law, 920 Key Bldg., 159 S. Main St., Akron, OH 44308, for appellee, Allstate Insurance Company. Court of Appeals of Ohio, Ninth Judicial District

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.