Cooke v. Cooke
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Cooke v. Cooke, 2005-Ohio-2262.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GEAUGA COUNTY, OHIO ROLLIN COOKE, III, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : -vs- : MEMORANDUM OPINION DEBORAH COOKE, CASE NO. 2005-G-2631 : May 6, 2005 Defendant-Appellant. Civil Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, Case No. 01 SU 000451. Judgment: Appeal Dismissed. Paul A. Newman, Newman & Brice, L.P.A., 214 East Park Street, Chardon, OH 44024 (For Plaintiff-Appellee). Elaine Tassi, 207 Chagrin North I, 34900 Chardon Road, Willoughby Hills, OH 44094 (For Defendant-Appellant). DIANE V. GRENDELL, J., {¶1} On March 28, 2005, appellant, Deborah Cooke, filed a notice of appeal from a February 25, 2005 judgment of the Geauga County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division. In that judgment, the trial court found appellant to be in contempt of court for failing to comply with the court ordered visitation schedule and she was sentenced to serve thirty (30) days in jail, and fined $500. However, appellant was given the opportunity to purge her contempt by complying with certain conditions. {¶2} In Boltauzer v. Boltauzer (Feb. 3, 1995), 11th Dist. No. 94-L-155, 1995 Ohio App. LEXIS 6119, this court stated: {¶3} Ohio courts have repeatedly held that contempt of court consists of two elements. The first is a finding of contempt, and the second is the imposition of a penalty or sanction. Until both have been made, there is no final order. Chain Bike v. Spoke N Wheel, Inc. (1979), 64 Ohio App.2d 62, 410 N.E.2d 802; Cooper v. Cooper (1984), 14 Ohio App.3d 327, 471 N.E.2d 525; State ex rel. Doe v. Tracy (1988), 51 Ohio App.3d 198, 555 N.E.2d 674. Id. at *1-*2. {¶4} In the present case, the trial court found appellant to be in contempt but she was also given the opportunity to purge herself of this contempt by doing a specified act. Thus, the second element of contempt has not yet occurred; namely, a finding by the trial court that the contemnor has failed to purge herself and the imposition of a penalty or sanction. Until that second order is made by the trial court, the contempt issue is not ripe for review. Simmons v. Simmons (Apr. 21, 1998), 11th Dist.No. 97-T-0128, Memorandum Opinion. {¶5} Accordingly, this case is hereby sua sponte dismissed due to lack of a final appealable order. {¶6} Appeal dismissed. DONALD R. FORD, P.J., WILLIAM M. O NEILL, J., concur. 2 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
