State ex rel. Alexander v. Synenberg

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as State ex rel. Alexander v. Synenberg, 2010-Ohio-6033.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 95603 STATE OF OHIO, EX REL. SHERRON ALEXANDER RELATOR vs. JOAN SYNENBERG, JUDGE RESPONDENT JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED Writ of Mandamus Motion No. 438738 Order No. 439428 RELEASE DATE: December 3, 2010 2 FOR RELATOR Sherron Alexander, pro se Inmate No. 474-351 Lake Erie Correctional Institution P.O. Box 8000 Conneaut, Ohio 44030 ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT William D. Mason Cuyahoga County Prosecutor By: James E. Moss Assistant County Prosecutor 8th Floor Justice Center 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 COLLEEN CONWAY COONEY, J.: {¶ 1} Sherron Alexander has filed a complaint for a writ of mandamus to require Judge Joan Synenberg to render a ruling on his motion for correction of sentencing error filed in State v. Alexander, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CR-445329.1 Judge Synenberg has filed a motion for summary judgment. 1Pursuant to Civ.R. 25(D)(1), Judge Joan Synenberg is substituted for the judge that was originally assigned to the underlying case. 3 {¶ 2} Attached to the motion for summary judgment is a copy of a journal entry, journalized on October 22, 2010, which demonstrates that a ruling has been rendered with regard to Alexander s motion for correction of sentencing error. Alexander s request for a writ of mandamus is moot. State ex rel. Fontanella v. Kantos, 117 Ohio St.3d 514, 2008-Ohio-1431, 885 N.E.2d 220. {¶ 3} Accordingly, we grant Judge Synenberg s motion for summary judgment. Costs to Alexander. It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Eighth District Court of Appeals serve notice of this judgment upon all parties as required by Civ.R. 58(B). Writ denied. ____________________________________________ COLLEEN CONWAY COONEY, JUDGE CHRISTINE T. MCMONAGLE, P.J., and PATRICIA A. BLACKMON, J., CONCUR

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.