Turner v. Russo

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as Turner v. Russo, 2006-Ohio-4490.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No. 87852 DONALD TURNER Relator vs. NANCY M. RUSSO, JUDGE Respondent : : : : : : : : : : ORIGINAL ACTION JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION DATE OF JOURNALIZATION: AUGUST 29, 2006 CHARACTER OF PROCEEDINGS: WRIT OF MANDAMUS JUDGMENT: Complaint Dismissed. Motion Nos. 381809 and 382500 Order No. 386972 APPEARANCES: For Relator: DONALD TURNER, pro se Inmate No. 0059102 Cuyahoga County Jail P.O. Box 5600 Cleveland, Ohio 44101 For Respondent: WILLIAM D. MASON Cuyahoga County Prosecutor BY: PAMELA BOLTON Assistant County Prosecutor Justice Center - 9th Floor 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 2 JUDGE FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR.: {¶ 1} Relator, Donald Turner, is the defendant in State v. Turner, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CR-453056. Turner avers that: respondent judge1 is assigned to Case No. CR- 453056; he has been in custody with respect to this matter since approximately June, 2004; and that he has neither requested nor consented to requests for continuances. He requests that this court compel respondent judge to bring him before the court for trial. {¶ 2} Respondent has moved to dismiss. For the reasons stated below, we grant the motion to dismiss. {¶ 3} Turner complains that he is being denied his right to a fast and speedy trial. Memorandum in Support of Complaint. [A] complaint for a writ of mandamus may not be employed to address a claim of lack of speedy trial. State ex rel. Hamilton v. Brunner, 105 Ohio St.3d 304, 2005-Ohio1735, 825 N.E.2d 607; State ex rel. Dix v. Angelotta (1985), 18 Ohio St.3d 115, 18 Ohio B. 146, 480 N.E.2d 407. The claim that [relator] has been denied a speedy trial can only be addressed through a direct appeal. Jackson v. Wilson, 100 Ohio St.3d 315, 2003 Ohio 6112, 798 N.E.2d 1086. State ex rel. Stadmire v. Common Pleas Court, Cuyahoga App. No. 87858, 2006-Ohio-1834, at ¶4. To the extent that Turner challenges the propriety of his remaining in custody before trial, relief in 1 Although the named respondent has recused herself and a new judge has been assigned, respondent has not demonstrated that the reassignment of the underlying case to a different judge is dispositive of this action. Cf. Civ.R. 25(D)(1). 3 mandamus is not appropriate. {¶ 4} We also note that the docket in the underlying case reflects that the court of common pleas has made several journal entries stating that various continuances were at the defendant s (that is, Turner s) request. Turner has not provided this court with any controlling authority under which his challenges to the accuracy of the record in the underlying case provide either a clear legal right to relief or a clear legal duty on the part of respondent to act as Turner has requested. {¶ 5} Rather, Turner is essentially complaining that, because the court of common pleas has taken too long to bring him to trial, he is entitled to relief in mandamus to compel the court of common pleas to commence trial in Case No. CR-443056. appropriate for the correction of errors irregularities in the underlying case. Fuerst, Cuyahoga App. No. 86118, Mandamus is not or procedural State ex rel. Smith v. 2005-Ohio-3829, at ¶4. Additionally, Turner has not demonstrated that an appeal would not be an adequate remedy. {¶ 6} Turner s complaint and supporting documentation also are defective in ways that require dismissal. A complaint for a writ of mandamus must be brought in the name of the state, on relation of the person applying. The failure of [relator] to properly caption her complaint for a writ of mandamus warrants dismissal. Marcano v. State, Cuyahoga App. No. 87797, 2006-Ohio-1946, at ¶2 4 (citations deleted). See also R.C. 2731.04. Turner s complaint is not captioned as being on relation of the state. {¶ 7} Similarly, the purported affidavits which Turner has submitted with his complaint and in support of his claim of indigency are not notarized. the requirement of He has not, therefore, complied with Loc.App.R. 45(B)(1) that he support his complaint with an affidavit specifying the details of the claim and he has not substantiated his claim of indigency. has not supported his complaint with an Likewise, Turner affidavit and other materials required by R.C. 2969.25. Although Turner argues that his jail being confined in the county exempts him from the requirements of R.C. 2969.25, R.C. 2969.21(D) includes a person confined in a county jail among those defined as an inmate. These circumstances provide grounds for dismissing this action, denying his claim of indigency and ordering him to pay costs. Jarrett v. Cuyahoga Cty. Common Pleas Court, Cuyahoga App. No. 87232, 2006-Ohio-2220. {¶ 8} We also note that the purported Affidavit of Verity merely recites that the statements in it are true and accurate to the best of my personal knowledge, awareness, and belief. Turner s use of this conclusory statement is not sufficient to comply with the Loc.App.R. 45(B)(1) requirement that the affidavit must specify the details of the claim. App. No. 85990, 2005-Ohio-2324. Barry v. Galvin, Cuyahoga 5 {¶ 9} Accordingly, respondent s motion to dismiss is granted. Relator to pay costs. The clerk is directed to serve upon the parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. Civ.R. 58(B). Complaint dismissed. FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR. PRESIDING JUDGE JAMES J. SWEENEY, J., CONCURS MARY EILEEN KILBANE, J., CONCURS

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.