R.L.T. v. T.R.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as R.L.T. v. T.R., 2003-Ohio-4053.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No. 81947 IN RE: R.T., MINOR R.L.T., FATHER Plaintiff-Appellant vs. T.R., MOTHER Defendant-Appellee DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT OF DECISION CHARACTER OF PROCEEDINGS JUDGMENT DATE OF JOURNALIZATION : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION July 31, 2003 Civil Appeal from the Common Pleas Court, Juvenile Division, Case No. 9500965 DISMISSED. APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff-Appellant R.L.T., Father: R.L.T., PRO SE th 2201 East 36 Street Cleveland, Ohio 44115 For Defendant-Appellee T.R., Mother: ERIC M. DRAKE 30432 Euclid Avenue Suite 101 Wickliffe, Ohio 44092 ANN S. BERGEN 24 Public Square Willoughby, Ohio 44094 ANTHONY O. CALABRESE, JR., J.: {¶1} This case is dismissed for lack of a final appealable order. Discovery orders do not constitute final appealable orders and therefore we lack jurisdiction to hear this appeal. Ohio Leitina Company v. City of Cleveland (June 22, 2000), Cuyahoga App. No. 76441. This appeal is dismissed. It is ordered that appellee recover of appellant costs herein taxed. A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. PATRICIA A. BLACKMON, P.J. and SEAN C. GALLAGHER, J. CONCUR. ANTHONY O. CALABRESE, JR. JUDGE N.B. This entry is an announcement of the court's decision. See App.R. 22(B), 22(D) and 26(A); Loc.App.R. 22. This decision will be journalized and will become the judgment and order of the court pursuant to App.R. 22(E) unless a motion for reconsideration with supporting brief, per App.R. 26(A), is filed within ten (10) days of the announcement of the court's decision. The time period for review by the Supreme Court of Ohio shall begin to run upon the journalization of this court's announcement of decision by the clerk per App.R. 22(E). See, also S.Ct.Prac.R. II, Section 2(A)(1).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.