In re Glass
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as In re Glass, 2005-Ohio-5668.] IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO VICTIMS OF CRIME DIVISION www.cco.state.oh.us IN RE: CHARLENE M. GLASS : Case No. V2005-80312 CHARLENE M. GLASS : ORDER OF A THREECOMMISSIONER PANEL Applicant : : : : : : {¶ 1} The applicant filed a reparations application seeking reimbursement of expenses incurred with respect to an alleged police brutality, discrimination, rape, and stalking incident on November 12, 2004. On March 1, 2005, the Attorney General denied the applicant s claim pursuant to R.C. 2743.60(E) contending that the applicant had been convicted of domestic violence on June 15, 1999. On March 8, 2005, the applicant filed a request for reconsideration. On April 19, 2005, the Attorney General denied the claim once again. On April 25, 2005, the applicant filed a notice of appeal to the Attorney General s Final Decision. Hence, this matter came to be heard before this panel of three commissioners on July 27, 2005 at 12:05 P.M. {¶ 2} Neither the applicant nor anyone on her behalf appeared at the hearing. An Assistant Attorney General attended the hearing and presented brief comments for the panel s consideration. The Assistant Attorney General indicated that she relies upon the documents contained within the claim file, which evidences the applicant s June 15, 1999 domestic violence conviction, and therefore maintains the Final Decision should be affirmed. Case No. V2005-80312 -1- ORDER {¶ 3} From review of the file and with full and careful consideration given to all the information presented at the hearing, this panel makes the following determination. We find that the applicant has failed to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that she qualifies as a victim of criminally injurious conduct. Therefore, the April 19, 2005 Final Decision of the Attorney General shall be affirmed and this claim shall be denied pursuant to R.C. 2743.52(A). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT 1) The April 19, 2005 decision of the Attorney General is AFFIRMED pursuant to R.C. 2743.52(A); 2) This claim is DENIED and judgment is rendered in favor of the state of Ohio; 3) Costs are assumed by the court of claims victims of crime fund. _______________________________________ JAMES H. HEWITT III Commissioner _______________________________________ LLOYD PIERRE-LOUIS Commissioner _______________________________________ RANDI OSTRY LE HOTY Commissioner ID #\1-dld-tad-072705 A copy of the foregoing was personally served upon the Attorney General and sent by regular mail to Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney and to: Filed 9-15-2005 Jr. Vol. 2258, Pgs. 68-69 To S.C. Reporter 10-25-2005 Case No. V2005-80312 -1- ORDER
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
