Crockett v. Ross Correctional Inst.

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Crockett v. Ross Correctional Inst., 2005-Ohio-3337.] IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO REGINALD CROCKETT : Plaintiff : v. : CASE NO. 2003-10619 Judge J. Craig Wright Magistrate Anderson M. Renick : JUDGMENT ENTRY ROSS CORRECTIONAL INST. Defendant : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : {¶ 1} This case was tried to a magistrate of the court. On April 29, 2005, the magistrate issued a decision recommending judgment for defendant. {¶ 2} Civ.R. 53(E)(3)(a) states: A party may file written objections to a magistrate s decision within fourteen days of the filing of the decision, regardless of whether the court has adopted the decision pursuant to Civ.R. 53(E)(4)(c). *** {¶ 3} Plaintiff did not provided in Civ.R. 53(E). file an objection within the time Plaintiff s handwritten letter addressed to the magistrate and filed with the court on June 2, 2005, is not accompanied by proof of service upon defendant as required by Civ.R. 5(D) and will not be considered by the court in reviewing the magistrate s decision. {¶ 4} Upon review, the court determines that there is no error of law or other defect on the face of the magistrate s decision. Therefore, the court adopts the magistrate s decision and recommendation as its own, including the findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in favor of defendant. therein. Judgment is rendered Court costs are assessed against plaintiff. Case No. 2003-10619 -2- JUDGMENT ENTRY {¶ 5} The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. ________________________________ J. CRAIG WRIGHT Judge Entry cc: Reginald Crockett 1418 Livingston Court Columbus, Ohio 43227 Plaintiff, Pro se Douglas R. Folkert Assistant Attorney General 150 East Gay Street, 23rd Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215-3130 Attorney for Defendant LP/MR/mdw Filed June 22, 2005 To S.C. reporter June 29, 2005

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.