Meadows v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as Meadows v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2005-Ohio-2545.] IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO www.cco.state.oh.us VIRGINIA MEADOWS, Admr. : Plaintiff : v. : CASE NO. 2001-02287 Judge J. Craig Wright Magistrate Steven A. Larson : JUDGMENT ENTRY DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION, et al. : Defendants : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : {¶ 1} This case was tried to a magistrate of the court. On March 14, 2005, the magistrate issued a decision recommending judgment for defendant. {¶ 2} Civ.R. 53(E)(3)(a) states: A party may file written objections to a magistrate s decision within fourteen days of the filing of the decision, regardless of whether the court has adopted the decision pursuant to Civ.R. 53(E)(4)(c). *** On April 4, 2005, the court granted plaintiff s motion for an extension of time to file objections. However, on April 14, 2005, plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss *** which the court construes as a notice to the court that plaintiff does not intend to file an objection to the magistrate s decision. {¶ 3} Upon review, the court determines that there is no error of law or other defect on the face of the magistrate s decision. Therefore, the court adopts the magistrate s decision and recommendation as its own, including the findings of fact and conclusions of law contained therein. favor of defendants. Judgment is rendered in Court costs are assessed against plaintiff. Case No. 2001-02287 -2- JUDGMENT ENTRY {¶ 4} The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. ________________________________ J. CRAIG WRIGHT Judge Entry cc: Richard F. Swope 6504 East Main Street Reynoldsburg, Ohio 43068-2268 Attorney for Plaintiff Velda K. Hofacker Carr Assistant Attorney General 150 East Gay Street, 23rd Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215-3130 Attorney for Defendants LP/cmd Filed May 17, 2005 To S.C. reporter May 23, 2005

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.