In re Clark

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as In re Clark, 2003-Ohio-6135.] IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO VICTIMS OF CRIME DIVISION IN RE: ELOISE CLARK : Case No. V2003-40551 ELOISE CLARK : ORDER OF A THREECOMMISSIONER PANEL Applicant : : : : : : This appeal came to be heard before this panel of three commissioners on August 20, 2003 at 11:00 A.M. upon the applicant s May 30, 2003 appeal from the April 2, 2003 Final Decision of the Attorney General. The applicant filed a reparations application on October 7, 2002 with respect to a September 10, 2000 assault. The Attorney General denied the applicant an award of reparations pursuant to R.C. 2743.56(B) and R.C. 2743.60(A) since the applicant failed to file a reparations application within two years of the criminally injurious conduct. The applicant appealed the Attorney General s Final Decision contending that her attorney failed to timely file her reparations application. Neither the applicant nor anyone on her behalf appeared at the hearing. An Assistant Attorney General attended the hearing and stated that she rests pending any questions from the panel. The panel chairman concluded the hearing. Case No. V2003-40551 -1- ORDER From review of the file and with full consideration given to all the information presented at the hearing, this panel finds the April 2, 2003 decision of the Attorney General shall be affirmed. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT 1) The April 2, 2003 decision of the Attorney General is AFFIRMED; 2) This claim is denied and judgment is entered for the state of Ohio; 3) Costs are assumed by the court of claims victims of crime fund. _______________________________________ JAMES H. HEWITT III Commissioner _______________________________________ LEO P. MORLEY Commissioner _______________________________________ KARL H. SCHNEIDER Commissioner ID #\3-dld-tad-091203 Filed 10-16-2003 Jr. Vol. 2251, Pgs. 124-125 To S.C. Reporter 11-19-2003

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.