Rouse v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as Rouse v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2001-Ohio-1853.] IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO CLARENCE W.H. ROUSE : Plaintiff : CASE NO. 2000-02437 v. : JUDGMENT ENTRY DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION : : Defendant : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : This case was tried to a magistrate of the court. On July 24, 2001, the magistrate issued a decision recommending judgment for defendant. Civ.R. 53 states: Within fourteen days of the filing of a magistrate s decision, a party may file written objections to the magistrate s decision. Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the decision. Upon review of the record and the magistrate s decision, the court determines that there is no error of law or other defect on the face of the magistrate s decision. Therefore, the court adopts the magistrate s decision and recommendation as its own. Judgment is rendered in favor of defendant. assessed against plaintiff. Court costs are The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. ________________________________ JUDGE [Cite as Rouse v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2001-Ohio-1853.] Entry cc: Richard F. Swope 6504 East Main Street Reynoldsburg, Ohio 43068 Attorney for Plaintiff Patrick J. Piccininni 65 East State St., 16th Fl. Columbus, Ohio 43215 Assistant Attorney General KWP/cmd Filed 9-21-2001 Jr. Vol. 680, Pgs. 205-206 To S.C. reporter 10-4-2001

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.