Huyck Corp. v. Town of Wake Forest

Annotate this Case

364 S.E.2d 139 (1988)

321 N.C. 589

HUYCK CORPORATION, Huyck Formex Division; Athey Products Corporation; Neuse Plastic Company, Inc.; Chappell Motors, Inc., d/b/a Bostrom Ford; Ronnie R. Bailey and wife, Elsie M. Bailey; Marvin C. Frazier and wife, Lara F. Frazier; Roy W. Wheeler and wife, Betty R. Wheeler; William L. Byrd and wife, Carolyn H. Byrd; Donald M. Whitt and wife, Nancy Garner Whitt; Douglas Walston and wife, Patricia Walston; Howard L. Cash and wife, Margie A. Cash; C.B. Cash and wife, Joyce Cash; C.D. Horton and wife, Mrs. C.D. Horton; Richard A. Cox and wife, Mrs. Richard A. Cox; William L. Robinson and wife, Beatrice Robinson; Joseph L. Savage and wife, Ruby L. Savage; J. Waidas Nines and wife, Mrs. J. Waidas Nines; Morris W. Edwards; William Terry Martin and wife, Carol P. Martin; Charlie H. Sammons and wife, Ruby M. Sammons; George L. Brown, Jr. and wife, Emma Brown; Russell S. Finch and wife, Anne C. Finch; Richard E. Hailey and wife, Becky Hailey; Jerry W. Laws and wife, Pat Laws; James L. Davis and wife, Mrs. James L. Davis; James L. Larson and wife, Lottie Larson; R.D. Beck, Jr. and wife, Mrs. R.D. Beck, Jr.; Louis A. Rollins and wife, Esther Lee Rollins; Dock R. Ray and wife, Lucille Ray; Jodie L. Hockaday; Terry Robert Young and wife, Gayle Young; Jim Hoy and wife, Mrs. Jim Hoy; William E. Alford and wife, Gloria J. Alford; Burley G. Munn and wife, Catherine Munn; William R. Dickerson and wife, Becky Dickerson; A.W. Adams and wife, Mrs. A.W. Adams; Robert Sumerlin and wife, Anna Sumerlin; Thomas J. Pendergrass and wife, Sophie E. Pendergrass v. TOWN OF WAKE FOREST.

No. 320PA87.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 3, 1988.

*140 I. Beverly Lake and Jane P. Harris, Wake Forest, for petitioners-appellants.

Ellis Nassif and Manning, Fulton & Skinner by Howard E. Manning and Charles E. Nichols, Jr., Raleigh, for respondent-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.