Lynch v. Hazelwood
Annotate this Case324 S.E.2d 224 (1985)
312 N.C. 224
Tina Darlene LYNCH v. Harry Aldene HAZELWOOD.
No. 327PA84.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
January 8, 1985.
Pollock, Fullenwider, Cunningham & Patterson by Bruce T. Cunningham, Jr., Southern Pines, for plaintiff-appellant.
Staton, Perkinson, West & Doster by Norman C. Post, Jr., Sanford, for defendant-appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The Court is evenly divided. Under these circumstances, following the uniform practice of this Court and the ancient rule of praesumitur pro negante, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed, not as precedent but as the decision in this case. Durham v. R.R., 113 N.C. 240, 18 S.E. 208 (1893); Reg. v. Millis, 8 Eng.Rep. 844 (1844).
AFFIRMED.
VAUGHN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
