State v. Troutman
Annotate this Case106 S.E.2d 572 (1959)
249 N.C. 398
STATE v. Junior TROUTMAN and Roy Barrett.
No. 152.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
January 14, 1959.
Malcolm B. Seawell, Raleigh, Atty. Gen., Claude L. Love, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
Mullen, Holland & Cooke, Gastonia, by Frank P. Cooke, Gastonia, for defendants, appellants.
PER CURIAM.
In State v. Troutman, N.C., 106 S.E.2d 569, the same defendants appealed from judgments imposing total sentences of four years on the roads, and the judgments have this day been upheld.
The sentences in this case were not ordered to begin at the expiration of the prior sentences, consequently they run concurrently with them. By upholding the sentences in this case, the defendants will complete serving them before the expiration of the first of the prior sentences. The defendants, therefore, are not prejudiced by the judgment involved in this appeal. Moreover, the assignments of error appear to be without substance.
No error.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
