In Matter of Crouch

Annotate this Case

221 S.E.2d 74 (1976)

28 N.C. App. 354

In the Matter of John Lewis CROUCH.

No. 7527DC644.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

January 7, 1976.

*75 Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten, by Asst. Atty. Gen. Parks H. Icenhour, Raleigh, for the State.

Roberts & Caldwell, P. A., by Jesse B. Caldwell, III, Mount Holly, for respondent.

MARTIN, Judge.

While it is clear from the record that the commitment period of ninety days has expired, this appeal is not moot. See In re Carter, 25 N.C.App. 442, 213 S.E.2d 409 (1975), and In re Mostella, 25 N.C.App. 666, 215 S.E.2d 790 (1975).

G.S. 122-58.7(i) provides: "To support a commitment order, the court is required to find, by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence, that the respondent is mentally ill or inebriate, and imminently dangerous to himself or others. The court shall record the facts which support its findings. (Emphasis added.)" In this case the commitment order is erroneous on its face since it fails to record the facts which support its findings as required by statute.

For the reasons stated, the order appealed from is

Reversed.

MORRIS and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.