Matter of Prestigiacomo

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Matter of Prestigiacomo 2016 NY Slip Op 32049(U) July 20, 2016 Surrogate's Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 2013-375172E Judge: Margaret C. Reilly Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various state and local government websites. These include the New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service, and the Bronx County Clerk's office. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. [* 1] SURROGATE’S COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU --------------------------------------------------------------------------x In the Matter of the Application of Julie Topaltzas and DECISION Joseph Prestigiacomo, Jr., as Limited Administrators, File No. 2013-375172E to Compel the Discovery and Turnover of Property Dec. No. 31546 Wrongfully Transferred and/or Withheld from the Estate of JOSEPH PRESTIGIACOMO, Deceased. --------------------------------------------------------------------------x PRESENT: HON. MARGARET C. REILLY The following papers were considered in the preparation of this decision: Motion to Quash Subpoenas and for a Protective Order. ............................. 1 Attorney’s Affirmation in Support................................................................ 2 Affirmation in Opposition. ........................................................................... 3 Attorney’s Affirmation in Reply................................................................... 4 ______________________________________________________________________________ The respondent, Katie Prestigiacomo (surviving spouse of Joseph Prestigiacomo and the preliminary executor of his estate) moves for an order: (1) pursuant to CPLR §2304 granting her application to quash and vacate multiple subpoenas duces tecum served upon non-party financial organizations and medical providers by two of the children of Joseph Prestigiacomo, Julie Topaltzas and Joseph Prestigiacomo, Jr., to whom this court issued limited letters of administration; (2) pursuant to CPLR §3103, granting the application of Katie Prestigiacomo for a protective order relieving the non-parties served with subpoenas of any obligation to respond to the subpoenas; and (3) staying the [* 2] underlying SCPA §2103 discovery proceeding pending the outcome of the probate proceeding. Joseph Prestigiacomo (the decedent) died on April 21, 2013, survived by his wife, Katie Prestigiacomo, and by five children: Julie Topaltzas, Joseph Prestigiacomo, Jr., Saundra Prestigiacomo, Deborah Bernard, and Francesca Flanagan. Two instruments were offered for probate: (1) a will dated November 19, 1998 (the 1998 Will), which was filed by Julie Topaltas and Joseph Prestigiacomo, Jr.; and (2) a will dated November 9, 2012 (the 2012 Will), which was filed by Katie Prestigiacomo. The proceeding to probate the 1998 Will has been held in abeyance.1 On September 5, 2013, preliminary letters testamentary issued to Katie Prestigiacomo pursuant to the 2012 Will. On April 16, 2015, limited letters of administration were issued to Julie Topaltzas and Joseph Prestigiacomo, Jr., for the purpose of commencing a discovery proceeding pursuant to SCPA §2103. Shortly after the issuance of the limited letters of administration, Julie Topaltzas and Joseph Prestigiacomo, Jr. served multiple subpoenas duces tecum. Katie Prestigiacomo filed a motion asking the court to quash the subpoenas or grant a protective order. On October 20, 2015, this court granted the motion to quash on the grounds that pre-trial discovery cannot take place until an SCPA §2103 proceeding has been commenced (Decision No. 31173). 1 In connection with that probate proceeding, examinations pursuant to SCPA §1404 were scheduled for June 3, 2016. 2 [* 3] On December 7, 2015, Julie Topaltzas and Joseph Prestigiacomo, Jr. filed a petition pursuant to SCPA §2103, for the discovery and/or turnover of assets belonging to the estate, along with an order for Katie Prestigiacomo to attend and be examined. Subpoenas duces tecum were served on the following non-parties: • • • • • • • • • • • • • Canale & Tellekamp, CPAs; Bank of America, N.A.; Merrill Lynch; Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated; Maddaloni Jewelers; Janney Montgomery Scott LLC; Citibank, N.A.; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.; St. Francis Hospital; South Nassau Communities Hospital; Dr. Gary Friedman; Dr. David Grill; and Dr. Howard Grill. The court must weigh the right of the parties who were granted limited letters to conduct a discovery proceeding against the fact that there is a concurrent probate proceeding for the 2012 Will, which may result in the termination of the interests of Julie Topaltzas and Joseph Prestigiacomo, Jr. in their father’s estate. If the court grants probate to the 2012 Will, the outcome of the discovery proceeding will have no effect on the estate other than the depletion of estate assets in payment of legal fees incurred in connection with the discovery proceeding. Moreover, once the upcoming SCPA §1404 examination in the probate proceeding is completed, it is likely that discovery will be sought in the probate proceeding that will be repetitive of the discovery sought in 3 [* 4] connection with the present proceeding, resulting in unnecessary and duplicative expenses. The court has authority to stay proceedings pending before it (SCPA §102; CPLR §2201). The court can “grant a stay of proceedings in a proper case, upon such terms as may be just” (CPLR §2201). Here, if the decedent’s 2012 Will is admitted to probate, any recovery that Julie Topaltzas and Joseph Prestigiacomo, Jr. might realize from the instant discovery proceeding against Katie Prestigiacomo would then be paid to Katie Prestigiacomo, as the executor of the decedent’s estate. Further, Katie Prestigiacomo is the lifetime beneficiary of a credit shelter bequest under Article Third of the 2012 Will, and the sole residuary beneficiary under Article Fifth. Thus, it appears that if the decedent’s 2012 Will is admitted to probate, the instant discovery proceeding will have done nothing but generate attorneys’ fees. If, however, the 2012 Will is denied probate, and the 1998 Will is subsequently admitted to probate, then the decedent’s estate will be shared in varying amounts among Katie Prestigiacomo and the decedent’s five children. If neither will is admitted to probate, the decedent’s assets will be divided among Katie Prestigiacomo and the decedent’s children in accordance with EPTL §4-1.1(a)(1). In both of those alternate scenarios, the discovery proceeding against Katie Prestigiacomo becomes important to Julie Topalzas, Joseph Prestigiacomo, Jr., and the decedent’s other children who are not involved in this proceeding, as they would ultimately share in any recovery against Katie. 4 [* 5] Accordingly, the court hereby grants the present motion: (1) to quash the subpoenas; (2) for a protective order; and (3) to stay the discovery proceeding pending the outcome of the probate proceeding in connection with the 2012 Will, but directs that if there is no final determination by the court concerning the probate of the 2012 Will within eighteen (18) months of the issuance of this decision, Julie and Joseph may seek, and the court will consider, a lifting of the stay granted by this decision. Dated: July 20, 2016 Mineola, New York E N T E R: HON. MARGARET C. REILLY Judge of the Surrogate’s Court cc: John Newman, Esq. Attorney for Petitioners 1776 East Jericho Tpke., Suite 2 Huntington, New York 11743 Richard T. Kerins, Esq. Mahon, Mahon, Kerins & O’Brien, LLC Attorney for Respondent 254 Nassau Boulevard South Garden City, New York 11530 Janney Montgomery Scott, LLC Attn: Barry Falk/Thomas Urban 3300 PGA Blvd., Suite 900 Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 Bank of America, N.A. 709 Old Country Rd. Dix Hills, New York 11746 Maddeloni Jewelers 1870 East Jericho Tpke. Huntington, New York 11743 5 [* 6] JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. National Subpoena Processing Mail Code IN 1-4054 7610 West Washington Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46231 Citibank, N.A. c/o Legal services Intake Unit 1 Court Square, 31 st Floor Long Island City, New York 11120 Canale & Tellekamp, CPA’s 140 South Ocean Avenue, Suite 2 Freeport, New York 11520 Merril Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated Attn: Megan Jordan P.O. Box 40239 Jacksonville, Florida 32203 St. Francis Hospital Attn: Medical Records 100 Port Washington Blvd. Roslyn, New York 11576 Drs. David Grill and Howard Grill 121 South Ocean Avenue, #1 Freeport, New York 11520 Dr. Gary Friedman 2 Ohio Drive, Suite 201 New Hyde Park, New York 11042 South Nassau Communities Hospital Attn: Medical Records 1 Healthy Way Oceanside, New York 11572 6

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.