Baker v 40 E. 80 Apt. Corp.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Baker v 40 E. 80 Apt. Corp. 2012 NY Slip Op 32634(U) October 10, 2012 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 603683/03 Judge: Paul Wooten Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service. Search E-Courts (http://www.nycourts.gov/ecourts) for any additional information on this case. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. SCANNEDON I011712012 [* 1] PAPERS NUMBERED Page 1 of 23 [* 2] cumentary Page 2 of 2 [* 3] [* 4] [* 5] d the walls to b oisture, dirt and growth (moss) ey revealed that the cavity is Zingher recommended that the face stallation of the brick veneer (id.). P a g e 5 o f 23 [* 6] [* 7] Bakers served a relief. In December 2005, plaintiffs embers cannot be held personally [* 8] t 80 argued that the third amended complaint ver, in response to this argument, the Ba ' Mem. of Law in Opposition, at 1). [* 9] [* 10] doing or evince[] a reckle I Corp., 79 NY2d 540, 554 [I 9921, 8 NY2d 377, 385 [1983]). Stated differently, [* 11] [* 12] [* 13] [* 14] Page [* 15] [* 16] [* 17] [* 18] [* 19] [* 20] on that all repairs hav [* 21] ant [* 22] auses of action, and plaintiffs request for punitive damages, but is [* 23]
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
