Matter of Holmes v New York City Hous. Auth.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Matter of Holmes v New York City Hous. Auth. 2012 NY Slip Op 31840(U) July 3, 2012 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 400604/12 Judge: Arlene P. Bluth Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service. Search E-Courts (http://www.nycourts.gov/ecourts) for any additional information on this case. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. [* 1] SCANNED ON 711312012 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEWYORK NEW YORK COUNTY PAR? Justlce ' I 1 - Index Number : 400604/2012 HOLMES, SAMUEL INDEX NO. vs. MOTION DATE NYC HOUSING AUTHORITY SEQUENCE NUMBER : 001 ARTICLE^^ The followlng papers, numbered It o Notlcs of MotlonlOrder to Show Cause c . 5 5 w b 117 d 7J, wnre road on thli motion tolfor I We). -Affldavlts - Exhlblts I 1Wi). t I Ws). AOwrmfng4Mdev Its - Exhiblts Replying Affldavits Upon the foregoing papers, It la ordered that this DECIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 'I' ACCOMPANYING DECISION/ORDER I - UNFILED JUDGMENT This judgment has qut been er'llered by the County C M and notice of entry cannot be served based hereon. To obtain enlry, counsel or authorized representative must appear in person at the Judgment Clerk's Desk ( R 14I ) B. I CHECK ONE: ..................................................................... . a NON-FINAL DISPOSITION CASE DISPOSED ........................... MOTION IS: GRANTED 0DENIED CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: ................................................ 0SEnLE ORDER 2. CHECK AS APPROPRIATE: 3. F 0 0DO NOT POST c1GRANTED IN PART 0OTHER 0SUBMIT ORDER 0FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT REFERENCE [* 2] SUPREME COLJIU OF THE STAl K O F N Y C OUNTY 0 1 7 NEW YOliIi: PAR I 4 Index No.: 400604/12 In thc Matter of the Rppliration of S ;I m ucl H o 1111c s 1 E CT S1ON, OTU3E R 1 AN 13 JlIDGM ICNT Petition vr, Pctitioiicr Samuel Holiiies. who is selI-LI-cpresciitcd, comiiienced this Arliclc 78 proceecling to c h i 1I c 1.1 fie N Yc I- In s deter i ii i rial i C)II d i s in i s s i ii g his rciii ai ning fa 11 ii 1y 11 1 ciiibcr gr ie var i cc beca 11s c IIC failed to remaiii curl-cnt in tlic payiiieiit 01 iisc atid occiipiincy while his gi-icvaiice was pending. NYCllIA cross-I~~ovcs dismiss this procediiig to 011 the groiincls thal petitioner has failed lo statc a c;iiise ~ 1x .i i o n hccaiise it i s tindisputed that lit. did riot pay use and occupancy and the rules rcqiiirc t h a ~ such pnyiiiciits wc itiadc in order to Iiavt. tlic grievance considered. For the reasor-is set Ibrtli below, NYC I Ih s cross-inotion is granted and h e proceeding is dismissed. Page 1 of 4 [* 3] NYCI IA provides ;I multi-step grievance procediire (cxli l to the cross-motion). Both thc l hopcrty Maiiagcr m c i tlic Borough Manager deniecl pctitioner s gricvancc heca~isc manngciiient iicvci- grvn~cd petitionci- permission to join his mother s Iioiisclwld (exhs 1: and G to tlic cross- moliori). At the conclusion of the 1iwriiig held hcfore hearing olliccr Rrlmt: Ainbct-t on January 5, 2012, N YC I-Thiiindc ;I motion to dismiss petitioiicr s gricvance bccausc he was not current in his payment or wx and occupamcy; spwificnlly, lic owed $7,138.62. IWitioiier s guai-diiin ad litciii st;ited 11131 he did not ciisputc any of tlic cvidcncc suhmittccl by N Y(. I IA, but wantccl tu record to rcllecl h a t pctitioiicr h i i d $ 1 , 1 00 to p y towards his use nncl oc,cupiiiicy arrcx-s. H ear i I I fi 0I I? c c I- s De t c 1.1 i ii tiii t i o ii In hcr clccision clatcd .faiiuary 12, 2012, heariiig o i k . x r Aiiihcrl grantccl NYCFTA s inotion to clisiiiiss h c gr-ievaiicc h r laclc ofjurisdiction on thc groiincis that petitioner was not currcrit with use and occiilxiiicy. By dctcimiti~itioi~ dalcci I cbriiary I , 2012, N YC HA s I3oat-d adoptccl the hea r i 1i g o l licc1- s d c c i s i ori. 117 his pclition clatcd M:ircli 7, 20 12, petitioner dc)es not dispult that he kiilcd to pay iisc anti occi.ipancy dill-ing tlic pendciicy ul liis gricvnncc. Instend, lic claims cui-i-enlwith a1 1 paymeiils hy April 20 1 2 wnd ;i this C ~ I . L I tu ( tliat lie will beconie orclci. NYCI IA to eritcr into ti paymciit plnii \villi h i i n Sigiiificm(ly, :iiincxecl t o t l x cross-rnotioii (cxli W) is ; copy of tlic reril I Page 2 of 4 [* 4] [* 5] UNFILED JUDGMENT I _ _ - This judgment has riot tm:n cntcred by the Courity Clerk nrid n o k e o enlry cannot be .served based hereon. To f oblain enlry. counwl o r auttlurizetl representative must appear II> person at the Judgment Clerk's Desk (Room 1418). Page 4 of 4

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.