Faust v Consolidated Carpet Assoc., LLC

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Faust v Consolidated Carpet Assoc., LLC 2012 NY Slip Op 31493(U) June 4, 2012 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 100097/2008 Judge: Saliann Scarpulla Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service. Search E-Courts (http://www.nycourts.gov/ecourts) for any additional information on this case. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. SCANNED ON 61612012 [* 1] SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY Index Number : 10009712008 FAUST, LAURA PART f.2 vs CONSOLIDATED CARPET INDEX NO. Sequence Number : 001 MOTION DATE AMEND CAPTION, PARTIES MOTION SEQ. NO. , were read on thls motion tolfor The following papen, numbered Ito Notlce of MotlonlOrder to Show Cause - Affldavlts - Exhibits IWs). IN O W IWs). Answering Affldavlts - Exhlbits Replying Affldavlts Upon the foregolng papers, It Is ordered that thle rnotlon Is & (4 b & [J& . , I I Dated: ! Y I I? I. CHECK ONE: ..................................................................... 2. CHECK AS APPROPRIATE: 3. CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: ........................... MOTION IS: ................................................ ! n 1 CASE DISPOSED GRANTED c]DENIED SEITLE ORDER 0DO NOT POST n NON-FINAL DISPOSITION GRANTED IN PART uOTHER 0SUBMIT ORDER 1-3FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT REFERENCE [* 2] I ION. SAI.IANN SC AKI I J1,I.A .I.: 1 [* 3] servc: a i i aincnded plciiding within order extciidiiig tliu it period lo be detcriiiined by ttic C oiirt; and ( 4 ) ror a11 clciidline lix-F u s t to filc the Note of Issue. Dcl enclaiil C oiisolitlatecl C C W havc the wine principals ;inti ~ Y C C L I lives, arid that he supcrviscs 1mth conipuiiics. 1Je also tcstj lied Iliat C C W nncl C C A share accoirntirig, hcnclit5 ;uid technology cle~~n~l~iients. I ho~igh McLxrg tcstillcd that CCl W and C C W niirrorcd cadi olhcr, Meberg sl:iled that lie was uiisiire whclher C CTW \?/as still iii existence when bausl was Mchcrg, a jiidgiiierit against C C A or C C W would no1 h u collcctivc ag:;ijtist the other 2 [* 4] UI c?icrciscs control ovcr the wycorl\ or daily operalioris ol tlie othcr company.- Mebcrg furthci- ntlesls tliat C C 1 W charigcd its riaine to C C TW Holdings, Inc. hcliu-e F a u s l s 3 [* 5] 4 [* 6] [* 7] lhjs coiislii[rtes tlic decision irnd order o f h e C ourt. Ilated: Ncw Yorl;, Ncw Yorli .IllllC 4, 20 I 2 h

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.