Matter of Seda v New York City Housing Auth.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Matter of Seda v New York City Housing Auth. 2012 NY Slip Op 31241(U) May 1, 2012 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 400293/12 Judge: Alexander W. Hunter Jr Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service. Search E-Courts (http://www.nycourts.gov/ecourts) for any additional information on this case. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. SCANNED ON 511112012 [* 1] SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY 3 3 PART .-LL Justlce lridex Number : 400293/2012 SEDA, ANGEL INDEX NO. vs. NYC HOUSING AUTHORITY SEQUENCE NUMBER : 001 MOTION DATE MOTION SEQ. NO. ARTICLE 7 8 The followlng papers, numbered Ito Notlce of MotlonlOrder to Show Cauee Answering Affidavits , were read on thls motlon tolfor ,- - Affidavits - Exhlblts IN O ( ~ ) .1-3 4-L' IW s ) . IWN. - Exhibits Replylng Affldavlts Upon the foregoing papenr, It is ordered that thls motlon Is ..................................................................... @CASE DISPOSED CHECK AS APPROPRIATE: ........................... MOTION IS: r] GRANTED k%ENIED CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: ................................................ 0SETTLE ORDER I. CHECK ONE: 2. 3. 1 DO NOT POST 7 0 NON-FINAL DISPOSITION r-1GRANTED IN PART 0OTHER nSUBMIT ORDER 0FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT 0REFERENCE [* 2] [* 3] [* 4] 'onsqiicntly. respoiidl;'iit argues lirst that t h i s court csnnot collaterally Littack the Civil Court's order and second t h a l h e petition is iiioot. [* 5] Scq Maticr of Pcll v. Hd. of ISduc. of llriion Frcc School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdalc L! Mamaroneck, Wcstchcstcr Clounty, 34 N.Y.2tl 222, 231 (1974). E v c ~ i thoirgh 111c cotirt ~ i i i g h t Iinvc clccided dilliireiitly were il in the agency s positioti, the cuiirl iiiay tiot upset thc agency s deter~~riiriiitioii the ithsencc o I . i i linding, not supported by this record, that tlic in cjc~eri~~iiiiition 110 I.:itioIli\l basis. In Lllc Mallcr+of Mid-State MfJt.Clorl,. V. Ncw York liacl City C. onciliatioti a i i d Appeals Ucl., 112 A.D.2d 7 2 , 76 ( I I k p t . 1985). Therefi)rc, this coin-t s 1 . 0 1is liniitcd 10 wl~ictlicr not respondcnt s lind determination was maclc without ;I rational ~ or basis . to the lilcts. . Ac c o rcf i iig 1 y i t is he rchy , 4
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
