People v Mendoza
Annotate this CaseDecided on November 18, 2021
No. 88 SSM 27
[*1]The People & c., Respondent, v.
v
Eugene Mendoza, Appellant.
Submitted by David Fitzmaurice, for appellant.
Submitted by William H. Branigan, for respondent.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed and case remitted to the Appellate Division, Second Department, for further proceedings. Under the totality of the circumstances and upon the People's concession, defendant's appeal waiver was invalid and therefore did not foreclose consideration of his harsh and excessive sentence claim (see People v Bisono, 36 NY3d 1013, 1017-1018 [2020]).
Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson, Singas and Cannataro concur.
Decided November 18, 2021
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.