Preston v APCH, Inc.
Annotate this CaseDecided on February 13, 2020
No. 35 SSM 31
[*1]Tracy Preston, & c., Appellant,
v
APCH, Inc. et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.
Submitted by William W. Pulos, for appellant.
Submitted by Jill L. Yonkers, for respondents.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs. Decedent's work as a welder during the "normal manufacturing process" of fabricating rotor components for air preheaters did not involve "erection, demolition, repairing, altering, painting, cleaning or pointing" of a building or structure (Jock v Fien , 80 NY2d 965, 968 [1992]; Labor Law § 240 [1]). Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur. Judge Fahey took no part.
Decided February 13, 2020
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.