People v Smart
Annotate this CaseDecided on June 29, 2017
No. 108 SSM 18
[*1]The People & c., Respondent,
v
Andrew Smart, Appellant.
Submitted by David P. Greenberg, for appellant.
Submitted by Jill Oziemblewski, for respondent.
MEMORANDUM:
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The record supports the Appellate Division's finding that the challenged lineup was not unduly suggestive. Accordingly, defendant's claim is beyond our further review (People v McBride, 14 NY3d 440, 448 [2010] [citation omitted]).
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia and Wilson concur. Judge Feinman took no part.
Decided June 29, 2017
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.