230 Park Ave. Holdco, LLC v Kurzman Karelsen & Frank, LLP

Annotate this Case
230 Park Ave. Holdco, LLC v Kurzman Karelsen & Frank, LLP 2016 NY Slip Op 04976 Decided on June 23, 2016 Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 23, 2016
No. 50

[*1]230 Park Avenue Holdco, LLC, Appellant,

v

Kurzman Karelsen & Frank, LLP, et al., Respondents.



Jay B. Solomon, for appellant.

Charles Palella, for respondents.



MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, without costs, by granting plaintiff's motion for summary judgment dismissing defendants' third affirmative defense, and, as so modified, affirmed and the certified question answered in the negative.

Plaintiff met its initial burden of demonstrating its entitlement to summary judgment dismissing defendants' third affirmative defense alleging that plaintiff breached the stipulation between the parties (see CPLR 3212 [b]; Zuckerman v City of New York , 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Defendants' submissions in opposition to plaintiff's motion failed to raise a material triable issue of fact (see CPLR 3212 [b]; see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp. , 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]).

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Order modified, without costs, by granting plaintiff's motion for summary judgment dismissing the third affirmative defense and, as so modified, affirmed and certified question answered in the negative, in a memorandum. Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur. Chief Judge DiFiore took no part.

Decided June 23, 2016



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.