People v Roshia

Annotate this Case
People v Roshia 2016 NY Slip Op 06859 Decided on October 20, 2016 Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 20, 2016
No. 217 SSM 19

[*1]The People & c., Respondent,

v

James M. Roshia, Jr. Appellant.



Submitted by Albert F. Lawrence, for appellant.

Submitted by Alexander Lesyk, Esq., for respondent.



MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant was indicted by a grand jury, a sexual assault evidence kit was taken from the victim, and County Court's order directing defendant to provide a DNA sample was authorized by statute (CPL 240.40[2][b][v]). Accordingly, County Court did not err in granting the People's application directing defendant to provide a buccal swab for testing.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.

Decided October 20, 2016



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.