Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept.
Annotate this Case
Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept.
2013 NY Slip Op 00886
Decided on February 12, 2013
Court of Appeals
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on February 12, 2013
No. 83 SSM 1
[*1]In the Matter of Perry Bellamy, Appellant,
v
New York City Police Department, Respondent.
Submitted by appellant, pro se.
Submitted by Sharyn Rootenberg, for respondent.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, without costs, and certified question not answered on the ground that it is unnecessary. In denying the subject Freedom of Information Law request, the Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott concur. Judge Rivera took no part.
Decided February 12, 2013
Decided on February 12, 2013
No. 83 SSM 1
[*1]In the Matter of Perry Bellamy, Appellant,
v
New York City Police Department, Respondent.
Submitted by appellant, pro se.
Submitted by Sharyn Rootenberg, for respondent.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, without costs, and certified question not answered on the ground that it is unnecessary. In denying the subject Freedom of Information Law request, the Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott concur. Judge Rivera took no part.
Decided February 12, 2013
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
