People v Feliciano
Annotate this CaseDecided on November 21, 2013
No. 255 SSM 28
[*1]The People & c., Respondent,
v
Wilson Feliciano, Appellant.
Submitted by Laura Boyd, for appellant.
Submitted by Martin J. Foncello, for respondent.
MEMORANDUM:
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant's contention that he completed the terms of his original plea agreement and was therefore entitled to dismissal of the indictment is not preserved for our review. Upon his discharge, defendant did not move for dismissal following the events that he now says [*2]constituted performance of the agreement.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.
Decided November 21, 2013
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.