DLJ Mtge. Capital, Inc. v Kontogiannis

Annotate this Case
DLJ Mtge. Capital, Inc. v Kontogiannis 2013 NY Slip Op 07516 Decided on November 14, 2013 Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 14, 2013
No. 253 SSM 29

[*1]DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc., Appellant,

v

Thomas Kontogiannis, et al., Defendants, Chicago Title Insurance Company, Inc., et al., Respondents.




Submitted by John P. Amato, for appellant.
Submitted by Arthur G. Jakoby, for respondent
Chicago Title Insurance Company, Inc.
Submitted by Michael J. Schwarz, for respondent
United General Title Insuance Co., Inc.


MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the [*2]certified question answered in the affirmative. As a matter of law, DLJ, as a third-party purchaser of mortgages on the secondary mortgage market, cannot rely on pre-closing documents to establish that a proper conveyance and recording of the underlying property occurred or that title insurance for the property was issued (see Citibank v Chicago Tit. Ins. Co., 214 AD2d 212, 219 [1st Dept 1995], lv dismissed 87 NY2d 896 [1995]). The Appellate Division correctly determined that any such reliance was unjustifiable.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.
Decided November 14, 2013

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.