Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP v Duane Reade
Annotate this Case
Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP v Duane Reade
2013 NY Slip Op 01997
Decided on March 26, 2013
Court of Appeals
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on March 26, 2013
No. 119 SSM 51
[*1]Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP, Appellant,
v
Duane Reade, et al., Respondents.
Submitted by Aaron H. Marks, for appellant.
Submitted by Charles E. Dorkey, III, for respondents.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs. The courts below did not err as a matter of law in dismissing the complaint (see Innophos, Inc. v Rhodia, S.A., 10 NY3d 25, 30 [2008]). Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Rivera concur.
Decided March 26, 2013
Decided on March 26, 2013
No. 119 SSM 51
[*1]Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP, Appellant,
v
Duane Reade, et al., Respondents.
Submitted by Aaron H. Marks, for appellant.
Submitted by Charles E. Dorkey, III, for respondents.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs. The courts below did not err as a matter of law in dismissing the complaint (see Innophos, Inc. v Rhodia, S.A., 10 NY3d 25, 30 [2008]). Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Rivera concur.
Decided March 26, 2013
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
