Carolyn Charley v. Margaret E. Goss

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

================================================================= This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------No. 79 SSM 3 Carolyn Charley, Appellant, v. Margaret E. Goss, et al., Respondents. Submitted by Thomas B. Grunfeld, for appellant. Submitted by Alison M. K. Lee, for respondent. MEMORANDUM: The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs. Defendants Howard Conroy and Margaret Goss presented prima facie evidence, including plaintiff's deposition testimony and medical records, that plaintiff did not suffer a serious - 1 - - 2 - SSM No. 3 injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]). In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur. Decided February 24, 2009 - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.