Koehl v Mirza

Annotate this Case
Koehl v Mirza 2009 NY Slip Op 06388 [13 NY3d 759] September 8, 2009 Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. As corrected through Wednesday, November 4, 2009

[*1] Edward Koehl, Appellant,
v
S. Mirza et al., Respondents.

Decided September 8, 2009

See Koehl v Mirza, 39 AD3d 1092.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Edward Koehl, appellant pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Robert M. Goldfarb, Barbara D. Underwood and Andrea Oser of counsel), for respondents.

{**13 NY3d at 759} OPINION OF THE COURT

Upon reargument, following remand by the Supreme Court of the United States, this Court's November 27, 2007 dismissal or{**13 NY3d at 760}der vacated and appeal reinstated (see Koehl v Mirza, 556 US , 129 S Ct 2734 [2009]; Haywood v Drown, 556 US , 129 S Ct 2108 [2009]).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.