Raffaele Ciocca v Sang K. Park

Annotate this Case
Ciocca v Park 2005 NY Slip Op 07733 [5 NY3d 835] October 20, 2005 Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 4, 2006

[*1] Raffaele Ciocca et al., Appellants,
v
Sang K. Park et al., Respondents.

Decided October 20, 2005

Ciocca v Park, 21 AD3d 671, affirmed.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Mark A. Schneider, Plattsburgh, for appellants.

Law Office of Paul G. Hanson, Albany (Paul G. Hanson of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. We agree with the Appellate Division majority that plaintiff failed to properly demonstrate causation. Plaintiff did not lay an adequate foundation for the testimony of his experts that plaintiff's injuries were caused by acute trauma as a result of a motor vehicle accident. Accordingly, [*2]defendants' motion for a directed verdict was properly granted.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.