Rice v. Penguin Putnam, Inc.
Annotate this Case98 N.Y.2d 635 (2002)
ADAM Z. RICE, Appellant, v. PENGUIN PUTNAM, INC., Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Submitted February 11, 2002.
Decided April 30, 2002.
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that denied appellant's cross motion to amend the complaint, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
