KLEECK v. State

Annotate this Case

18 N.Y.2d 897 (1966)

Ralph Van Kleeck et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. State of New York, Respondent-Appellant. (Claim No. 39285.)

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued October 18, 1966.

Decided November 29, 1966.

Guido J. Napoletano and William J. Ryan for appellants-respondents.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Julius L. Sackman and Ruth Kessler Toch of counsel), for respondent-appellant.

Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and KEATING concur.

*899MEMORANDUM.

The order appealed from should be modified (see Cornell v. T. V. Development Corp., 17 N Y 2d 69, 73). Since the property was valued on a commercial basis, no value should have been assigned to the buildings on the property, which were inconsistent with that use (Matter of Erlanger, 237 N.Y. 159, 164; Spano v. State of New York, 22 A D 2d 757). Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division is modified to the extent of striking therefrom so much as awards $15,000 for the buildings and, as modified, the order is affirmed, with costs.

Order modified in accordance with the memorandum herein and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.