Rodriguez v New York Motor Group, LLC

Annotate this Case
[*1] Rodriguez v New York Motor Group, LLC 2015 NY Slip Op 51129(U) Decided on July 27, 2015 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on July 27, 2015
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ.
2013-2356 Q C

Jose A. Rodriguez, Respondent,

against

New York Motor Group, LLC, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Barry A. Schwartz, J.), entered October 8, 2013. The order denied defendant's motion to vacate a default judgment.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff commenced this small claims action to recover the principal sum of $4,700, representing the deposit plaintiff had made in connection with his purchase of a used car. After defendant failed to answer or appear, the Civil Court (William A. Viscovich, J.), by order dated March 7, 2013, awarded plaintiff a default judgment in the principal sum of $4,700. Defendant subsequently moved to vacate the default judgment. By order dated May 6, 2013, the Civil Court (Jodi Orlow, J.) granted defendant's motion and adjourned the case to August 6, 2013 for trial. On August 6th, defendant failed to appear, and an inquest was held, after which the Civil Court (Jodi Orlow, J.) awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $4,700. Thereafter, defendant moved to vacate the August 2013 default judgment, and the Civil Court (Barry A. Schwartz, J.), by order dated October 3, 2013, denied the motion. Upon a review of the record, we find that the Civil Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying defendant's motion to vacate the August 2013 default judgment since defendant failed to demonstrate that it had a reasonable excuse for its default in appearing on August 6, 2013 (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v A.C. Dutton Lbr. Co., 67 NY2d 138, 141 [1986]).

Accordingly, the order is affirmed.

Pesce, P.J., Aliotta and Elliot, JJ., concur.


Decision Date: July 27, 2015

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.