Roccanova v Rosen

Annotate this Case
[*1] Roccanova v Rosen 2012 NY Slip Op 52261(U) Decided on December 7, 2012 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on December 7, 2012
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : LaSALLE, J.P., MOLIA and IANNACCI, JJ
2011-151 N C.

Joseph Roccanova, Appellant,

against

Richard Rosen, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Nassau County, Second District (Tricia M. Ferrell, J.), entered June 21, 2010. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the action.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

In this small claims action, plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of $5,000, alleging, among other things, that he had been harassed and defamed by defendant. Plaintiff also alleged, and testified at a nonjury trial of the action, that, as a result of a complaint lodged by defendant, plaintiff had been wrongfully arrested and charged with a crime, and, in effect, that defendant had brought a frivolous civil action against plaintiff. Plaintiff asserted that, although the criminal charges had ultimately been dropped, and the civil action had been withdrawn, he had incurred legal fees in defending against the charges in both actions. Plaintiff seeks in this action to recover money damages, based on his payment of legal fees to defend himself in the prior criminal and civil proceedings, as well as money damages for defamation and harassment. Following trial, the action was dismissed.

The sole argument plaintiff makes on appeal is that the District Court lacked jurisdiction over this action. However, inasmuch as plaintiff sought to recover money damages only, in the sum of $5,000, the District Court had jurisdiction over this small claims action (see UDCA [*2]1801).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

LaSalle, J.P., Molia and Iannacci, JJ., concur.
Decision Date: December 07, 2012

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.