Milio Sons, Inc. v Begum

Annotate this Case
[*1] Milio Sons, Inc. v Begum 2012 NY Slip Op 52183(U) Decided on November 26, 2012 Appellate Term, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on November 26, 2012
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : NICOLAI, P.J., IANNACCI and LaSALLE, JJ
2011-1817 W C.

Milio Sons, Inc., Respondent, Nov 26, 2012

against

Jameel U. Begum, Appellant.

Appeal from a final judgment of the City Court of Yonkers, Westchester County (Thomas R. Daly, J.), entered February 1, 2011. The final judgment awarded landlord possession, arrears of $1,080 and attorney's fees of $205, plus costs, in a nonpayment summary proceeding.


ORDERED that the final judgment is reversed, without costs, and the matter is remitted to the City Court for a trial.

In this nonpayment proceeding, the petition seeks rent arrears through September 2010 and late fees, for a total of $1,420.32, plus attorney's fees of $205. On the September 27, 2010 return date of the petition, tenant failed to appear and landlord was awarded a final judgment for possession, arrears of $1,420.32, attorney's fees of $205, and costs. Thereafter, tenant moved to vacate the default final judgment. On January 21, 2011, the City Court granted tenant's motion, vacated the prior default final judgment, allowed landlord to amend the petition to include rent through January 2011 and awarded landlord a new final judgment for possession, arrears of $1,080, attorney's fees of $205, and costs. A final judgment was entered on February 1, 2011 pursuant to the January 21, 2011 decision.

As no record was made of the January 21, 2011 proceedings, there is nothing in the record before this court which supports the entry of the final judgment. It is noted that the record [*2]does not contain a copy of the lease or otherwise establish that landlord is entitled to recover attorney's fees as additional rent (see Peekskill Hous. Auth. v Quaintance, 20 Misc 3d 57 [App Term, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2008]). Accordingly, the final judgment must be reversed and the matter remitted to the City Court for a trial.

Nicolai, P.J., Iannacci and LaSalle, JJ., concur.
Decision Date: November 26, 2012

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.